Comments on: Reverse Proxy Performance – Varnish vs. Squid (Part 1)

By: Delicious Bookmarks for August 28th from 18:00 to 22:57 « Lâmôlabs

Delicious Bookmarks for August 28th from 18:00 to 22:57 « Lâmôlabs — Sun, 29 Aug 2010 03:02:56 +0000

[...] Deserialized » Blog Archive » Reverse Proxy Performance – Varnish vs. Squid – August 28th %(postalicious-tags)( tags: varnish performance squid proxy benchmark comparison server web cache )% [...]

By: Ángel C. Lázaro

Ángel C. Lázaro — Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:08:42 +0000

Hi,

Great post!, I´m trying to decide about this two tools, Squid and Varnish to configure as accelerator for a OpenCms web portal and now I´ve more data, thanks.

To do the tests I would like to advise about The Grinder, it´s a wonderful tool to do use case tests.

Regards,

By: DeServ – Info » Reverse Proxy Performance – Varnish vs. Squid (Part 2)

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:33:53 +0000

[...] [...]

By: Durability, Scalability, Availability ·

Durability, Scalability, Availability · — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:25:09 +0000

[...] is currently the fastest, which one is easier to setup or integrate with legacy apps etc. I’m certainly NOT trying to get into that! In fact I will skirt the issue entirely saying this: when the features [...]

By: Are there networking limitations with running Apache on Windows XP Professional? | Linux Backup Server

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:22:12 +0000

[...] Reverse Proxy Performance – Varnish vs. Squid (Part 1) [...]

By: Reverse Proxy Performance – Varnish vs. Squid (Part 2) | Deserialized

Reverse Proxy Performance – Varnish vs. Squid (Part 2) | Deserialized — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:50:25 +0000

[...] [...]

By: Cachin Performance: Squid vs. Varnish : The Caching Chronicles

Cachin Performance: Squid vs. Varnish : The Caching Chronicles — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:07:24 +0000

[...] deserialized.com there’s a nice pair (Part I & Part II) of articles comparing Squid and Varnish. While the findings there closely resemble [...]