<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing while() loops with for() loops in C#</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deserialized.com/comparing-while-loops-with-for-loops-in-c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deserialized.com/comparing-while-loops-with-for-loops-in-c/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 03:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alper</title>
		<link>http://deserialized.com/comparing-while-loops-with-for-loops-in-c/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Alper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deserialized.com/?p=21#comment-3</guid>
		<description>But these two loops are not same. In for loop you are using less than and in the other you are using equals and one of them is going forward and the other is going backward thus utilizing early initialization - which I don&#039;t think that initialization will create an effect but still effects the logic. Loops are not working in the same logic, so the comparison is not healthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But these two loops are not same. In for loop you are using less than and in the other you are using equals and one of them is going forward and the other is going backward thus utilizing early initialization &#8211; which I don&#8217;t think that initialization will create an effect but still effects the logic. Loops are not working in the same logic, so the comparison is not healthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
